A curious phenomenon has recently grabbed my
attention as I was teaching journalism students. Although I have always been
aware of it, it wasn’t until a couple of weeks ago that I was circumstantially
obliged to delve deeper into its analysis. I have thereby learnt a couple of
interesting truths such as, for example, the fact that newspaper headlines are
never written by the authors of the articles they introduce as they have to
follow a set of strict formal and conceptual rules – they need to be short and
adjust perfectly to the newspapers’ space requirements and obviously attract
potential buyers or persuade people to read articles withing the newspaper they
have purchased. But apart from these obvious market-led goals, what is most
interesting about headlines is the type of language used by their authors – the
translators of headlinese, as the "language" is dubbed by some.
A quick glance at some Spanish language
headlines reveals a specific use of language that employs short and precise present
tense sentences.
La OTAN niega que Rusia haya retirado sus tropas de la frontera con Ucrania
El Gobierno prevé un crecimiento de hasta el 1,5% para este año
Marcelo se rompe y no estará ante el Dortmund
Simplicity is also rule number one in English
headlines, yet it is true they go a step further making the message even more
compact. A crash course in headline-writing would probably look like this:
1)
Remove
articles and unnecessary grammar/lexical elements
2)
Use
present tense, gerunds, past participles or plain noun phrases
3)
Use
headlinese vocabulary (there are special lists of word used in headlines only)
4) Use "to + V" instead of the future tense
5) It can never start with the article "a" (as argued by Weir 2009)
4) Use "to + V" instead of the future tense
5) It can never start with the article "a" (as argued by Weir 2009)
Migrants face 'living hell' in Greece
Stem cell scientist 'faked evidence'
Not only do headlinese translators, who often
hold special headline writing positions in the media, go to great lengths to
shorten their messages; they also use humour and word play with numerous
cultural references which may make their work impenetrable to non-experts or non-native speakers.
Torrential rain in most arias. (about an open-air opera concert, a word play base on the homophony areas/arias; a textbook example)
Sometimes headlinese lends itself to ambiguous
interpretations due to the flexibility of the English language when
switching between different grammatical categories/parts of speech codified by
one word - a phenomenon called conversion (e.g. cut can be both a noun and a verb). The ease with which nouns can play the role of adjectives when placed before a noun doesn’t help. Nor
does the fact that those noun+noun lists are not limited by anything but the perceptual
and anaylitical skills of the speakers. For example, what does world trade centre exactly mean: is
it a trade centre that is unique in the world ([world [trade centre]) or is it
a centre of world trade ([[world trade] centre]? The difference may be subtle,
yet the first version suggests there is only one, while the second doesn’t. Surprisingly, Centro de comercio mundial receives 401.000 Google search results, while centro
mundial de comercio - 329.000. So most people seem not to care.
And how exactly should we interpret these
examples taken from a webpage than gathers funny headline botches:
Eye drops off shelf
Squad helps dog bite victim
Dealers will hear car talk at noon
Two Soviet ships collide - one dies
Does
number 1 talk about eye drops that were taken off the shelf [[eye drops] [off
shelf]] or one eye that fell off the shelf [[eye] [drops off shelf]]. Or in
number 2: whom does the squad actualy help: the victim or the dog? Are cars talking in 3 or is it
about a talk in/about the car? Is one correferential with ship in 4 or is there
actually a person involved?
Some more nice instances from todays online press:
Some more nice instances from todays online press:
White House's 'Cuban Twitter' denial
Services sector growth eases
Supreme Court Strikes Down Overall Political Donation CapI'll leave it at that. At the end of the day, the Internet's full of examples.
NOTE: All examples have been taken from the
cited sources, except for the world trade centre bit, which has always bothered
me personally.
Sources and further reading:
Weir (2009): Article Drop in English Headlinese [online] http://people.umass.edu/aweir/Weir-2009-headlinese.pdf
http://funnies.paco.to/Headlines.html
http://www.theguardian.co.uk
http://www.elpais.es
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headlinese
http://www.uiltexas.org/files/academics/journalism/headline-overview.pdf
Sources and further reading:
Weir (2009): Article Drop in English Headlinese [online] http://people.umass.edu/aweir/Weir-2009-headlinese.pdf
http://funnies.paco.to/Headlines.html
http://www.theguardian.co.uk
http://www.elpais.es
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headlinese
http://www.uiltexas.org/files/academics/journalism/headline-overview.pdf